Grab the RSS feed

Closer to Home




Having been talking a lot at a huge, global scale, it’s time to turn things on their head and focus in on the national scale. Dear old blighty (the UK, for the uninitiated) naturally has large banks of hydrological research, given the strength of our academia. The question is, what is going to happen to river flow, runoff and flooding in the future? Will we still be able to sit near the local river in driving rain on a ‘summers’ day, eat poor quality ice cream and have a family argument?

In the early 2000s, Defra advised that research in the UK should take account of possible climate change by modelling a 20% increase in peak flows in the next 50 years. Back in 2004, Reynard, et al. (2004) carried out hydrological modelling using UKCIP02 climate scenarios (UKCIP09 are now the most recent) and concluded that all but the most extreme increases in flow across major catchments in the UK would be within this 20% boundary. This would suggest the 20% peak flow increase is a useful precautionary value in the face of great uncertainty of the effect of climate change on river flow. Kay, et al. (2009) identify the variety of sources of uncertainty in hydrological prediction: future greenhouse gas emissions; Global Climate Model (GCM) structure; downscaling from global to regional model level; the structure and parameterisation of hydrological models, and the natural internal variability of climate. Clearly, this is not an easy process with any level of great surety. Both Kay, et al. (2009) and Prudhomme, et al. (2003) concur that the largest uncertainties are attributed to the type of GCM that is used, suggesting predictions for the future should be made using a variety of GCMs under a range of climate scenarios.

With respect to likely effects of climate change on rivers in the UK, Wilby, et al. (2008) suggest a connection between the seasonality of flood and the seasonality of climate in larger catchments; the peak of annual rainfall is followed by annual peak of discharge, as with the River Thames. For smaller catchments, large flow events tend to be more flashy in nature and occur directly after the heaviest rain, whatever time of the year – future changes in precipitation intensity could have implications for flows and flash flooding in such catchments. Prudhomme,et al. (2003) model the largest increases of peak flow in the UK (using a variety of GCMs) to be in northern England and Scotland, with a 0.13% increase in flood magnitude each year, compared to 0.04-0.05% in southern catchments of England. While some of this may be related to catchment morphology, there is a clear geographical signal of climate change across the country. 

After all the global scale examination, we see that even an island as small as the UK will likely be differentially affected by changes in discharge and flood magnitude as a result of climatic change. At least we’ll still have the weather to moan about.

0 comments:

  •