Grab the RSS feed

Open The Floodgates



We know river discharge is going to change around the globe into the future, as a result of changes in the hydrologic cycle forced by climate change. However a numerical change in discharge means very little to anymore more than a poorly groomed, strangely bearded (see figure), obsessive hydrologist. Potential changes in discharge can affect humans in a number of ways, and one of the more obvious is changes in flood risk. Flooding can often be a bad thing, but in some case it can be important e.g. providing water for agriculture, recharging groundwater supplies.

The mark of many a hydrologist.

Modelling studies have indicated that human-induced greenhouse gas increases have contributed to an increase in the intensity of heavy rainfall across 65% of the Northern Hemisphere, and that in the future many places will be subject to an intensification of heavy rainfall. This is because as greenhouse gas levels rise (of which CO2) is one, the planet will warm, which means clouds have to have more water in them to be able to rain – so when it does rain, it rains a lot. These changes promote increases in large flood events – more water = higher flood risk. 

Throughout the 20th century, the frequency of large food events (technically speaking, a flood that would be expected to happen every 100years) have become more frequent, and statistical modelling suggests that is trend will continue to occur as CO2 levels rise. Already historical changes in radiative forcing may have caused the increase in large food events in the 20th century. 

Recent work looks at the changes in the magnitude of flood events with a 30 year return periods, and clear patterns emerge (Figure 1). Increases in flooding are projected in central and eastern Siberia, as well as southeast Asia, including India. Decreases in flooding are projected in northern and eastern Europe, and parts of central South America, around the Amazon basin. These patterns are similar to those projected to river discharge – it is no surprise to see the two are interlinked.


Figure 1 - Projected percentage changes in the magnitude of 30 year return flood events. From Dankers, et al. (2014).

These changes in relatively common floods (every 30 years) have to potential to impact humans, whether it is destruction by floodwaters or agricultural drought from a lack of water inundation. We will focus on specific impacts in another post, but it is clear that humans are innately linked to river discharge and flooding.

I leave you with the song that inspired the name of this post.


0 comments:

  •